Loading...

Check, Please

Over a 400-year history, gingham has become the pattern of the people.

Howl8 ft3 web header
Howl8 ft1 master pnp habshaer nh 2
Manchester, New Hampshire, follows in the cotton-manufacturing footsteps of the English city of the same name.
Photo: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, HABS NH,6-MANCH,2—50
Howl8 ft1 wiz
A Dorothy Gale illustration by W.W. Denslow presages Judy Garland’s famous costume by almost four decades. (1900)
Photo: George Arents Collection, The New York Public Library. “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz” The New York Public Library Digital Collections.
Howl8 ft1 picnic
Toni Frissell
Picnics Around the World (ca. 1970)
Photo: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, Toni Frissell Photograph Collection, [reproduction number LC-DIG-tofr-14051]
Howl8 ft1 master pnp girls
Two little girls in a park near Union Station, Washington, D.C. (ca. 1943)
Photo: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, FSA/OWI Collection, [reproduction number LC-USW361-746]

Today it is the pat­tern of Amer­i­can pic­nic blan­kets and restau­rant table­cloths, of prairie dress­es and but­ton-downs. Yet ging­ham wasn’t always so thor­ough­ly engrained in Amer­i­can cul­ture. Nor was it even a three-toned check. As cul­ture his­to­ri­an Jude Stew­art explains in the 2015 book Pat­ter­na­lia, Ging­ham was first named for the weave, a sim­ple twill [that] pro­duced no right’ or wrong’ side.” The weave also was like­ly invent­ed in India, as most schol­ars point to the Malay word geng­gang for gingham’s root. The term lit­er­al­ly trans­lates to striped” and indeed, the cot­ton cloth fea­tured stripes when Dutch mer­chants first import­ed it to Europe in the 17th century.


How did this metaphor­i­cal leop­ard change its spots? Gingham’s visu­al evo­lu­tion to a check­ered pat­tern coin­cid­ed with its shift to West­ern pro­duc­tion, as seen in arti­facts and images from the Geor­gian and Vic­to­ri­an eras. Indus­tri­al pro­duc­tion of tex­tiles has its roots in Man­ches­ter, Eng­land, thanks to the wool and fus­t­ian weavers who had called the city home since the 1500s. When the British Empire out­lawed cot­ton man­u­fac­tur­ing in India after col­o­niza­tion in 1757, pro­duc­tion of the cloth cen­tered in Man­ches­ter, where 99 cot­ton-spin­ning enter­pris­es had sprout­ed by 1830. Sup­plied by cot­ton plan­ta­tions in the South, Amer­i­can tex­tile indus­tri­al­iza­tion had begun to soar at approx­i­mate­ly the same time, while tak­ing its style cues from the British. On both sides of the Atlantic, ging­ham check rung in the 19th century.

While striped ging­ham, not to men­tion the occa­sion­al plaid, did not dis­ap­pear overnight, a glimpse of the 1897 Sears, Roe­buck & Co. cat­a­log explains why those oth­er pat­terns fad­ed from pop­u­lar­i­ty. The so-called Book of Bar­gains fea­tured only one striped ging­ham, and the yardage cost a mul­ti­pli­er more than the apron checks” and dress ging­hams” that Sears, Roe­buck had stocked. Sim­ply put, check was cheap, and con­sumers vot­ed for it with their wallets.

Check­ered ging­ham was an afford­able long-term invest­ment, too. It could take a beat­ing and con­ceal stains and wrin­kles or be reversed for a do-over. It is lit­tle won­der, then, that it became the tex­tile of Amer­i­can work.

But pop­u­lar cul­ture in late-Vic­to­ri­an-era Amer­i­ca did more than bear wit­ness to check­ered gingham’s place in the lives of labor­ers and house­wives. It also worked might­i­ly to enshrine the tex­tile as a sym­bol of pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, opti­mism, and whole­some­ness — redo­lent of sum­mer­time and the prairies,” as Stew­art phrased it in Pat­ter­na­lia. In 1915, Dorothy Don­nell Cal­houn intro­duced read­ers to a lov­ing retired cou­ple in Blue Ging­ham Folks, and two years pri­or the musi­cal the­ater com­pos­er Manuel Klein gushed over the girl in a ging­ham gown whose grace and dig­ni­ty” out­shone city girls with silks and laces.” And, of course, there’s Dorothy Gale, who dreams of return­ing from Oz to her fam­i­ly and home in Kansas. Dorothy had only one oth­er dress, but that hap­pened to be clean, and was hang­ing on a peg beside her bed. It was ging­ham, with checks of white and blue; and although the blue was some­what fad­ed with many wash­ings, it was still a pret­ty frock,” L. Frank Baum wrote of the morn­ing his The Won­der­ful Wiz­ard of Oz hero­ine would take her first steps along the yel­low brick road.

Ging­ham was simul­ta­ne­ous­ly chang­ing with the times, too. In 1916, Kansas City design­er Nel­ly Don intro­duced a mass-pro­duced house­dress in pink ging­ham, sell­ing 216 of them at Peck’s Dry Goods Com­pa­ny on day one. Accord­ing to schol­ars Miky­oung Whang and Sher­ry Haar, the grand lady of the gar­ment indus­try” was one of the most suc­cess­ful female entre­pre­neurs in ear­ly-20th-cen­tu­ry Amer­i­ca and her prod­uct freed buy­ers from mak­ing their wardrobe from pat­terns, inti­mat­ing a new role for mid­dle-class women in Amer­i­can soci­ety. New inter­pre­ta­tions of ging­ham became more vis­i­ble there­after. Jour­nal­ist Mark Dent observed that ging­ham out­fits helped define Doris Day’s allur­ing per­sona. The pat­tern became part of 1960s British youth cul­ture when rebel­lious fash­ion design­er Bar­bara Hulan­ic­ki pub­lished a ging­ham shift dress in The Dai­ly Mir­ror, and Comme des Garçons design­er Rei Kawakubo’s lumpy ging­ham dress­es for spring/​summer 1997 ignit­ed con­ver­sa­tions about fem­i­nism, gen­der, and body image that are ongo­ing. Fast for­ward to now, and ging­ham is adorn­ing camp­sites and cam­pus­es, hang­ing in lock­ers as well as bou­tiques, express­ing nos­tal­gia or sub­ver­sion. It adapts, there­fore it is indispensable.

Today it is the pat­tern of Amer­i­can pic­nic blan­kets and restau­rant table­cloths, of prairie dress­es and but­ton-downs. Yet ging­ham wasn’t always so thor­ough­ly engrained in Amer­i­can cul­ture. Nor was it even a three-toned check. As cul­ture his­to­ri­an Jude Stew­art explains in the 2015 book Pat­ter­na­lia, Ging­ham was first named for the weave, a sim­ple twill [that] pro­duced no right’ or wrong’ side.” The weave also was like­ly invent­ed in India, as most schol­ars point to the Malay word geng­gang for gingham’s root. The term lit­er­al­ly trans­lates to striped” and indeed, the cot­ton cloth fea­tured stripes when Dutch mer­chants first import­ed it to Europe in the 17th century.


How did this metaphor­i­cal leop­ard change its spots? Gingham’s visu­al evo­lu­tion to a check­ered pat­tern coin­cid­ed with its shift to West­ern pro­duc­tion, as seen in arti­facts and images from the Geor­gian and Vic­to­ri­an eras. Indus­tri­al pro­duc­tion of tex­tiles has its roots in Man­ches­ter, Eng­land, thanks to the wool and fus­t­ian weavers who had called the city home since the 1500s. When the British Empire out­lawed cot­ton man­u­fac­tur­ing in India after col­o­niza­tion in 1757, pro­duc­tion of the cloth cen­tered in Man­ches­ter, where 99 cot­ton-spin­ning enter­pris­es had sprout­ed by 1830. Sup­plied by cot­ton plan­ta­tions in the South, Amer­i­can tex­tile indus­tri­al­iza­tion had begun to soar at approx­i­mate­ly the same time, while tak­ing its style cues from the British. On both sides of the Atlantic, ging­ham check rung in the 19th century.

While striped ging­ham, not to men­tion the occa­sion­al plaid, did not dis­ap­pear overnight, a glimpse of the 1897 Sears, Roe­buck & Co. cat­a­log explains why those oth­er pat­terns fad­ed from pop­u­lar­i­ty. The so-called Book of Bar­gains fea­tured only one striped ging­ham, and the yardage cost a mul­ti­pli­er more than the apron checks” and dress ging­hams” that Sears, Roe­buck had stocked. Sim­ply put, check was cheap, and con­sumers vot­ed for it with their wallets.

Check­ered ging­ham was an afford­able long-term invest­ment, too. It could take a beat­ing and con­ceal stains and wrin­kles or be reversed for a do-over. It is lit­tle won­der, then, that it became the tex­tile of Amer­i­can work.

Howl8 ft1 master pnp habshaer nh 2
Manchester, New Hampshire, follows in the cotton-manufacturing footsteps of the English city of the same name.
Photo: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, HABS NH,6-MANCH,2—50

But pop­u­lar cul­ture in late-Vic­to­ri­an-era Amer­i­ca did more than bear wit­ness to check­ered gingham’s place in the lives of labor­ers and house­wives. It also worked might­i­ly to enshrine the tex­tile as a sym­bol of pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, opti­mism, and whole­some­ness — redo­lent of sum­mer­time and the prairies,” as Stew­art phrased it in Pat­ter­na­lia. In 1915, Dorothy Don­nell Cal­houn intro­duced read­ers to a lov­ing retired cou­ple in Blue Ging­ham Folks, and two years pri­or the musi­cal the­ater com­pos­er Manuel Klein gushed over the girl in a ging­ham gown whose grace and dig­ni­ty” out­shone city girls with silks and laces.” And, of course, there’s Dorothy Gale, who dreams of return­ing from Oz to her fam­i­ly and home in Kansas. Dorothy had only one oth­er dress, but that hap­pened to be clean, and was hang­ing on a peg beside her bed. It was ging­ham, with checks of white and blue; and although the blue was some­what fad­ed with many wash­ings, it was still a pret­ty frock,” L. Frank Baum wrote of the morn­ing his The Won­der­ful Wiz­ard of Oz hero­ine would take her first steps along the yel­low brick road.

Howl8 ft1 wiz
A Dorothy Gale illustration by W.W. Denslow presages Judy Garland’s famous costume by almost four decades. (1900)
Photo: George Arents Collection, The New York Public Library. “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz” The New York Public Library Digital Collections.

Ging­ham was simul­ta­ne­ous­ly chang­ing with the times, too. In 1916, Kansas City design­er Nel­ly Don intro­duced a mass-pro­duced house­dress in pink ging­ham, sell­ing 216 of them at Peck’s Dry Goods Com­pa­ny on day one. Accord­ing to schol­ars Miky­oung Whang and Sher­ry Haar, the grand lady of the gar­ment indus­try” was one of the most suc­cess­ful female entre­pre­neurs in ear­ly-20th-cen­tu­ry Amer­i­ca and her prod­uct freed buy­ers from mak­ing their wardrobe from pat­terns, inti­mat­ing a new role for mid­dle-class women in Amer­i­can soci­ety. New inter­pre­ta­tions of ging­ham became more vis­i­ble there­after. Jour­nal­ist Mark Dent observed that ging­ham out­fits helped define Doris Day’s allur­ing per­sona. The pat­tern became part of 1960s British youth cul­ture when rebel­lious fash­ion design­er Bar­bara Hulan­ic­ki pub­lished a ging­ham shift dress in The Dai­ly Mir­ror, and Comme des Garçons design­er Rei Kawakubo’s lumpy ging­ham dress­es for spring/​summer 1997 ignit­ed con­ver­sa­tions about fem­i­nism, gen­der, and body image that are ongo­ing. Fast for­ward to now, and ging­ham is adorn­ing camp­sites and cam­pus­es, hang­ing in lock­ers as well as bou­tiques, express­ing nos­tal­gia or sub­ver­sion. It adapts, there­fore it is indispensable.

Howl8 ft1 picnic
Toni Frissell
Picnics Around the World (ca. 1970)
Photo: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, Toni Frissell Photograph Collection, [reproduction number LC-DIG-tofr-14051]
Howl8 ft1 master pnp girls
Two little girls in a park near Union Station, Washington, D.C. (ca. 1943)
Photo: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, FSA/OWI Collection, [reproduction number LC-USW361-746]